Thursday, 30 August 2012
Monday, 27 August 2012
Weird and Wonderful: Death’s Head Hawk Moth
Gemma Hallam
Death’s Head Hawk Moth |
These poor fellows
have become an omen of death as they have a skull-like marking on their ‘chest’
between their head and abdomen. The 3
species of Death’s Head Hawk Moths all have sinister names; Atropos – a member of the moiari who
cuts the thread of life in Greek mythology, Lachesis
– another of the 3 moirai, responsible for deciding the length of a
person’s life thread, and Styx – the
river to the underworld. The third moirai, Clotho, may have missed out on the
allocation of one of the species, because her role in the trio is deciding when
people are born and she can bring people back from the dead; far too optimistic
for association with these gloomy moths!
The caterpillar comes in 3 coloured varieties: a light green/yellow with darker stripes (as pictured), a pale blue shade with washed-out stripes, and a brown snakeskin type with a white head, which makes it look like a bird poo! They do not hatch from their larva with the stripes, but develop them at the 3rd out of 5 stages (or instar) of being a larva (before they become a caterpillar). They’re not very active and only move to feed (sound familiar?), but they are feisty! If disturbed, they thrash about in an attempt to gnash their attacker with their mandibles.
The insects have relatively short proboscis (protruding tubular noses used for feeding) rendering it incapable of reaching into plants to feed on the nectar. Instead, they feed on honey, tricking the bees into not attacking them by squeaking in a way similar to the Queen Bee. If a guard bee attacks them, it’s not too much of a problem because with their immunity to the bee sting and thick, protective bodies, they can handle a bit of hassle, however, after drinking honey, the moths can’t squeak for about 5 hours and have to make a swift exit from the hive. They’re aided in doing so through ‘chemical camouflage’, emitting an odour containing the 4 fatty acids that bees carry around. This has earned the species the nickname ‘bee robbers’, but they will settle for rotting fruit and tree sap. The larva feed on potato leaves (although this has decreased with the rise of mechanical farming), buddleia and ominously, deadly night shade.
The caterpillar comes in 3 coloured varieties: a light green/yellow with darker stripes (as pictured), a pale blue shade with washed-out stripes, and a brown snakeskin type with a white head, which makes it look like a bird poo! They do not hatch from their larva with the stripes, but develop them at the 3rd out of 5 stages (or instar) of being a larva (before they become a caterpillar). They’re not very active and only move to feed (sound familiar?), but they are feisty! If disturbed, they thrash about in an attempt to gnash their attacker with their mandibles.
The insects have relatively short proboscis (protruding tubular noses used for feeding) rendering it incapable of reaching into plants to feed on the nectar. Instead, they feed on honey, tricking the bees into not attacking them by squeaking in a way similar to the Queen Bee. If a guard bee attacks them, it’s not too much of a problem because with their immunity to the bee sting and thick, protective bodies, they can handle a bit of hassle, however, after drinking honey, the moths can’t squeak for about 5 hours and have to make a swift exit from the hive. They’re aided in doing so through ‘chemical camouflage’, emitting an odour containing the 4 fatty acids that bees carry around. This has earned the species the nickname ‘bee robbers’, but they will settle for rotting fruit and tree sap. The larva feed on potato leaves (although this has decreased with the rise of mechanical farming), buddleia and ominously, deadly night shade.
Death’s Head Hawk Moth caterpillar - James Twose |
Check out this video about the Death’s Head Hawk Moth:
Friday, 24 August 2012
Saturday, 18 August 2012
Weird and Wonderful: Glaucus atlanticus, the real life Pokémon
Tom Stubbs
This peculiar creature has only recently become famous and
many people have still not even heard of it. The most amazing feature of this
animal is its stunning appearance, looking like a cross between a dragon and a
Pokémon! In fact Glaucus atlanticus is a sea slug, in the group Gastropoda,
that also includes snails and land slugs. G.atlanticus is actually rather small reaching a maximum size of around 3cm. Despite its small
size this miniature dragon mimic has many amazing characteristics. They use gas
bubbles in their stomachs to float in the water column and pursue prey using appendages
to swim. Amazingly G.atlanticus feeds on hydrozoans, including the infamous
deadly Portuguese Man O’ War. They have the ability to harness poison from the
stings of prey and use this as a defensive sting themselves, which unlike most
sea slugs, can hurt humans. Finally, G.atlanticus is also a hermaphrodite
possessing the reproductive organs of both sexes!
Spread the word about this amazing little critter and check
out the video below:
Sunday, 12 August 2012
Evolution of the athlete
Felicity Russell
Early Homos, such as Homo habilis, Homo rudolfensis and Homo erectus are thought to have lived within the last 2.5 million years, coincident with discoveries of stone tools. A bigger brain size has often been associated with early Homos, suggesting they are more like Homo sapiens (‘intelligent man’). Three new fossils have recently been discovered supporting claims that Homo rudolfensis is a separate species from Homo habilis. Later Homos include Homo heidelbergensis, Homo neanderthalensis and Homo floresiensis. Homo heidelbergensis lived 300,000 to 700,000 years ago and wooden spears have been found nearby indicating that they hunted large animals. Homo neanderthalensis are thought to have used more advanced stone tools to carve meat from larger mammals. They had a large browridge and a human-sized brain. They are also known to have buried their dead and the more recent Neanderthals also made simple jewellery from animal teeth. They may have gone extinct as recent as 30,000 years ago. Homo floresiensis is the most recent distinct species, living up to just 17,000 years ago. They were short, often referred to as hobbits, and despite having smaller brains researchers have still found evidence that this species also used tools. Homo sapiens may have existed as long as 200,000 years ago originating from Africa and by 30,000 years ago they replaced Neanderthals in Europe.
Noakes and Spedding (2012) have
now suggested that it is our ability to run and to dissipate heat which aided our evolution. As forests disappeared and large open savannahs
appeared, our ancestors had to adapt and evolve from a skeleton developed for
tree climbing to a structure required for walking and even running. A lack of
body hair and the ability to sweat as much as 3 litres in an hour meant we
could lose heat more easily and enabled us to chase after four legged prey
which require panting as a mechanism to dissipate heat. The prey would not be
able to pant and run at the same time and eventually would be driven to heat
stroke. The development of longer legs, shorter toes, a stronger gluteus
maximus, larger weight bearing joints and broader shoulders is suggested to
have aided our ability to run long distances. We have also been able to develop
an aerobic capacity capable of supporting such long distance runs unlike any
other ape species. Therefore as you celebrate how extraordinarily well our
athletes have done for London 2012, remember how remarkable evolution can
really be.
Fun point: Australopithecus anamensis, Australopithecus afarensis, Australopithecus africanus – try saying this over and over again it is definitely a tongue twister.
The evolution of human stance
More information:
Fossil record of early humans - http://www.becominghuman.org/node/human-lineage-through-time
New fossil discoveries - http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn22151-fossils-confirm-three-early-humans-roamed-africa.html
Noakes and Spedding (2012) paper - http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v487/n7407/full/487295a.html?WT.ec_id=NATURE-20120719
As
the London 2012 Olympics draw to a close and we have watched how our athletes
push their bodies to the extreme to achieve award winning performances, it is
easy to see what an amazing species we are. A species more advanced compared to
the many other living creatures that we share our planet with. Especially as
our closest living relative happens to be the chimpanzee, that split from us 6-8
million years ago. How is it that tree dwelling apes evolved into a species capable
of such athleticism? Only recently numerous fragmentary fossils have been
discovered which start to reveal our origins and how we came to evolve.
Sahelanthropus |
The oldest suspected hominin
species found is Sahelanthropus,
thought to be 6-7 million years old. The skull appears ape-like but has a
distinctive browridge like other identified hominin species. The hole at the
base of the skull where the spinal cord passes (foramen magnum) is horizontally
orientated suggesting a bipedal posture. Another indication of a hominin
species is provided by the shape of its teeth, Sahelanthropus has small canines unlike the larger sharp ape-like
canines. Ardipithecus ramidus and Ardipithecus kadabba, thought to have lived
between 5.8-4.3 million years ago, are two more examples of hominins where
tooth shape indicates a more human like function. However, clues found from Ardipithecus toe bones controversially
suggests bipedalism, as joint surfaces are different in humans whose feet flex
up to a greater extent than chimpanzees.
Australopithecus species, such as Australopithecus afarensis, Australopithecus anamensis and Australopithecus africanus, lived approximately 3 million years ago. They have thicker tooth enamel compared to apes and the shape of their canines and premolars suggest a more human function. The presence of shorter, broader hips is indicative of a more human like posture and leg bones have revealed human like features. The Paranthropus group, often thought as part of the Australopithecus group, existed 2.5 million years ago. They are also described as bipedal and interesting dental evidence suggests they were especially well adapted to eating nuts and seeds.
Australopithecus species, such as Australopithecus afarensis, Australopithecus anamensis and Australopithecus africanus, lived approximately 3 million years ago. They have thicker tooth enamel compared to apes and the shape of their canines and premolars suggest a more human function. The presence of shorter, broader hips is indicative of a more human like posture and leg bones have revealed human like features. The Paranthropus group, often thought as part of the Australopithecus group, existed 2.5 million years ago. They are also described as bipedal and interesting dental evidence suggests they were especially well adapted to eating nuts and seeds.
Early Homos, such as Homo habilis, Homo rudolfensis and Homo erectus are thought to have lived within the last 2.5 million years, coincident with discoveries of stone tools. A bigger brain size has often been associated with early Homos, suggesting they are more like Homo sapiens (‘intelligent man’). Three new fossils have recently been discovered supporting claims that Homo rudolfensis is a separate species from Homo habilis. Later Homos include Homo heidelbergensis, Homo neanderthalensis and Homo floresiensis. Homo heidelbergensis lived 300,000 to 700,000 years ago and wooden spears have been found nearby indicating that they hunted large animals. Homo neanderthalensis are thought to have used more advanced stone tools to carve meat from larger mammals. They had a large browridge and a human-sized brain. They are also known to have buried their dead and the more recent Neanderthals also made simple jewellery from animal teeth. They may have gone extinct as recent as 30,000 years ago. Homo floresiensis is the most recent distinct species, living up to just 17,000 years ago. They were short, often referred to as hobbits, and despite having smaller brains researchers have still found evidence that this species also used tools. Homo sapiens may have existed as long as 200,000 years ago originating from Africa and by 30,000 years ago they replaced Neanderthals in Europe.
Did humans evolve to run? ILLUSTRATION BY PHIL DISLEY |
Fun point: Australopithecus anamensis, Australopithecus afarensis, Australopithecus africanus – try saying this over and over again it is definitely a tongue twister.
The evolution of human stance
More information:
Fossil record of early humans - http://www.becominghuman.org/node/human-lineage-through-time
New fossil discoveries - http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn22151-fossils-confirm-three-early-humans-roamed-africa.html
Noakes and Spedding (2012) paper - http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v487/n7407/full/487295a.html?WT.ec_id=NATURE-20120719
Wednesday, 8 August 2012
The Animal Olympics
We are over halfway through the Summer Olympic Games of
2012. Over the last week we have witnessed some incredible feats of speed and
strength and multiple world records have been broken. But how do us hairless bipeds compare to other members of the animal
kingdom?
Speed kings
Usain Bolt won the 100m sprint gold medal with a time of 9.63 seconds and in the 2008 Beijing Games he ran 9.69 seconds to win gold. More impressively, in the 2009 World Championships Bolt set two world records, running 100m in 9.58 seconds and 200m in a time of 19.19 seconds. This consistency has established him as the fastest human athlete ever. However, compared to some members of the animal kingdom Bolt looks like a bit of a slouch. The cheetah could complete the 100m sprint in 5.8 seconds and it is around twice as fast as the world's top sprinters, reaching speeds of 64mph. Bolt’s 200m record would be smashed by a cheetah that would complete it in just 6.9 seconds. The pronghorn antelope is another speedy competitor with running speeds of around 55 mph. If the pronghorn entered the 800m it could complete it in an incredible 33 seconds. To put this into context, the Kenyan 800m world record holder, runner David Rushida, ran that distance in 1 minute, 41 seconds.
Stamina, strength and swimming
How do our athletes compare in other Olympic events? Well this year’s Olympic gold long jump was won by Greg Rutherford with a leap of 8.31m. The world record long jump is a whopping 8.95 meters, currently held by Mike Powell. This distance approaches the leap of the red kangaroo (12.8 m) but falls short of the snow leopard that can jump up to 15 metres. Behdad Salimikordasiabi is considered the strongest man in the world after winning gold in the men's +105kg weightlifting category, lifting 247kg in the final. An elephant can lift 300kg with its trunk alone and the Gorilla, one of our closest relatives, can lift an unbelievable 900kg! It would be hard to argue that Michael Phelps is not the greatest swimmer of all time. In a 200m freestyle race Phelps swims around 4mph, a sailfish can travel at speeds of 67mph!
Although these comparisons may seem rather strange because the various animals mentioned are adapted to a specific mode of life, it does serve to highlight the incredible athletics abilities evolved through natural selection. Equally, these comparisons highlight the exceptional versatility of the human body. With training, athletes are able to tune their bodies to specific tasks. Can you image finding individuals within any other species that have such variation in speed and strength? This is what the Olympics places in the spotlight.
Speed kings
Usain Bolt won the 100m sprint gold medal with a time of 9.63 seconds and in the 2008 Beijing Games he ran 9.69 seconds to win gold. More impressively, in the 2009 World Championships Bolt set two world records, running 100m in 9.58 seconds and 200m in a time of 19.19 seconds. This consistency has established him as the fastest human athlete ever. However, compared to some members of the animal kingdom Bolt looks like a bit of a slouch. The cheetah could complete the 100m sprint in 5.8 seconds and it is around twice as fast as the world's top sprinters, reaching speeds of 64mph. Bolt’s 200m record would be smashed by a cheetah that would complete it in just 6.9 seconds. The pronghorn antelope is another speedy competitor with running speeds of around 55 mph. If the pronghorn entered the 800m it could complete it in an incredible 33 seconds. To put this into context, the Kenyan 800m world record holder, runner David Rushida, ran that distance in 1 minute, 41 seconds.
Stamina, strength and swimming
How do our athletes compare in other Olympic events? Well this year’s Olympic gold long jump was won by Greg Rutherford with a leap of 8.31m. The world record long jump is a whopping 8.95 meters, currently held by Mike Powell. This distance approaches the leap of the red kangaroo (12.8 m) but falls short of the snow leopard that can jump up to 15 metres. Behdad Salimikordasiabi is considered the strongest man in the world after winning gold in the men's +105kg weightlifting category, lifting 247kg in the final. An elephant can lift 300kg with its trunk alone and the Gorilla, one of our closest relatives, can lift an unbelievable 900kg! It would be hard to argue that Michael Phelps is not the greatest swimmer of all time. In a 200m freestyle race Phelps swims around 4mph, a sailfish can travel at speeds of 67mph!
Although these comparisons may seem rather strange because the various animals mentioned are adapted to a specific mode of life, it does serve to highlight the incredible athletics abilities evolved through natural selection. Equally, these comparisons highlight the exceptional versatility of the human body. With training, athletes are able to tune their bodies to specific tasks. Can you image finding individuals within any other species that have such variation in speed and strength? This is what the Olympics places in the spotlight.
Check out the videos below!
Bolt vs. Cheetah
The 10 Fastest Creatures on Earth
Wednesday, 1 August 2012
Ants, Bees and Brains
Alicja Jedrzejewska
Waggle Dance of the Honeybee - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bFDGPgXtK-U
Ants, bees
and brains, or more specifically rock ants, honeybees and neurones, have
surprisingly a lot in common. However insignificant when singled out, when
grouped together as a swarm, colony or a brain, they can generate astonishing
properties. Are the properties of these superorganisms enough to conclude they
can think as one, just like the brain? In other words, is there colony-level
cognition?
An example of such an emergent property is colony-level decision
making exhibited by ants during house hunting. The scout ants visit potential
house sites. They collect information about the site, including the size of the
cavity, the width of the entrance and the darkness. If a scout ant evaluates the house to be
appropriate, it starts teaching other ants the way to the new house, so they
can also evaluate it. This is done by secretion of chemicals called pheromones
along the path to the house. The other ants can smell these chemicals, which
allow them to trace the correct way. This behaviour is known as tandem running,
and enables other ants to visit the site and decide for themselves whether they
think it is a good site or not. If a nest is of good quality, a scout will wait
less time before recruiting others to it, whereas if it is of poor quality they
will wait a lot longer. This period of waiting is the latency period.
House hunting ants |
When enough ants are present in the new nest a quorum is
reached, and the whole colony makes a decision to move. This is a rapid move
whereby ants start carrying other ants on their backs to speed up the process.
The quorum threshold depends on individual situations. In times of danger speed
is more important than accuracy so the quorum threshold decreases drastically
(less ants have to be present in the nest in order for a decision to be
reached), whereas when the colony is safe the quorum threshold rises so a more
accurate decision can be made.
Just like ants, bees reach the decision of moving their hive
collectively. Individual bees go out looking for new hives. When they encounter
an appropriate site they do a waggle dance in front of the other bees. The
waggle dance informs the other bees about the location of the site. This allows
the other bees to investigate the site by themselves. The better the site the
longer the bees will dance for. With time more and more bees start to dance
advocating their ‘favourite site’. When
there is a close match between two sites bees start to ‘buzz’ one another in an
attempt to silence the bees advocating the competing site. This allows for a
collective, final decision to be made.
Just like ants and bees, neurons ‘make’ decisions
collectively. An example of this can be seen when a person is presented with a
screen with some dots going right and some left and a decision has to be made
as to where most dots are going. Some neurones will be firing due to left dot
movement and others due to right movement. Final decision is based upon the
larger number of neurones firing for either side.
So there you go! Ants, bees and brains have more in common
than you originally might have thought. A lot of research in this area is still
going on and we are learning more and more about the fascinating properties of
colony-level cognition. Some of the pioneering research in this field is
actually being carried out by researches at the University of Bristol. If you
would like to know more about the information in this article let us know via
email or otherwise, and we will provide you with the references used to write
it.
More information:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)